Sunday, May 16, 2010
Friday, May 7, 2010
Ubuntu 10.04, Thunderbird and a 24-hour clock
I'll cut straight to the point and spare the philosophical pondering to the end.
To make Thunderbird in Ubuntu display dates (and time) in ISO 8601 you need to do is:
sudo nano /etc/default/locale
on the command line and add the following line to the file:
LC_TIME="en_DK.utf8"
That's it.
Now to my rant.
Why is this so difficult, it shouldn't be needed to touch the command line to make this change?
Why can't the locale en_DK.utf8 (English as they speak in Denmark) be named something better?
Why can't you Americans use a 24 hour day(and night)? You don't even have a word for it like e.g. Swedish dygn or Finnish vuorokausi which both mean a 24-hour period.
Don't even get me started on the dates, 4/5/2010 and 4/5/2010 is it April 5:th or May 4:th, how about trying to update the date Blogger displayed, 5/5/10, from the fifth to the seventh!?
And don't forget Letter vs. A4, but I'll save that for another time.
To make Thunderbird in Ubuntu display dates (and time) in ISO 8601 you need to do is:
sudo nano /etc/default/locale
on the command line and add the following line to the file:
LC_TIME="en_DK.utf8"
That's it.
Now to my rant.
Why is this so difficult, it shouldn't be needed to touch the command line to make this change?
Why can't the locale en_DK.utf8 (English as they speak in Denmark) be named something better?
Why can't you Americans use a 24 hour day(and night)? You don't even have a word for it like e.g. Swedish dygn or Finnish vuorokausi which both mean a 24-hour period.
Don't even get me started on the dates, 4/5/2010 and 4/5/2010 is it April 5:th or May 4:th, how about trying to update the date Blogger displayed, 5/5/10, from the fifth to the seventh!?
And don't forget Letter vs. A4, but I'll save that for another time.
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Voddler - Ambitious but disappointing
I was pleasantly surprised when a Voddler invitation arrived to my inbox. After trying it out I had some mixed feelings about the service and decided to write this review. Voddler is a commercial VOD (video-on-demand) service (still in beta) with a similar concept as Spotify, but with the difference that Spotify does music while Voddler does movies/video.
After a short registration process I was given the opportunity to download the client. Sadly there were only versions for Windows and OSX. The installation went smoothly with the 15.5MB windows installer, but I found it bit annoying that during the installation process the installer started to download an additional 15MB package, apparently it was the Adobe AIR installer. The only way to start the player is by choosing a movie from the Voddler webpage, this even if the player is installed locally and the movies are cached on disk.
Sadly this is the point where things start to go downhill.
At the time of writing there were only 45 movies available, 20 free and the rest 25 costing between 2 to 4 euros. I understand that Voddler is still in beta, but this is a huge problem. People have more then 45 DVD:s at home and this is supposed to be a VOD service. It will also be interesting to know if the users are actually willing to pay for the movies or just watch the free ones. I doubt that the current model will work. To succeed Voddler needs to make all the content free, sponsored with commercials, and to have a premium service with a (monthly) subscription fee, just like Spotify.
It's interesting that the Voddler front page has an ad that state they have both Toy Story and Toy Story 2 available, well I didn't find them. I chose to watch, a for me totally unknown movie as most of them were, Wolfhound.
Besides the company related information the Voddler web pages only contain the content list and the possibility to edit your user account. This is good because it is all that is really needed. Please keep it that way. The user account page includes the payment settings to pay for content with credit cards. The web pages work fine except for some strange lag/glitch in the movie list filtering (Premium/Free checkboxes).
The player itself seemed to work surprisingly well. The UI was clean and simplistic. Jumping to an arbitrary location was slow by this was not Voddlers fault (see below). Stopping the player and then restarting it, made the player ask me if I wish to resume from the previous location, how nice of it. The player defaults to full-screen, but works in windowed mode too. Subtitles work and the language can be changed during playback. The player includes the ability to play video at a lower resolution, this is useful on slower hardware.
Sadly my slow Intel Atom N280 based laptop and slow internet connection made the movie unwatchable. This because of lots of lagging and buffering, but that is definitely not Voddlers fault. Also to be honest, the movie seemed quite boring.
Voddler doesn't seem technically too bad (except for the missing Linux client), but they need content, content and more content.
So, just to summarize, Voddler - Ambitious but disappointing.
After a short registration process I was given the opportunity to download the client. Sadly there were only versions for Windows and OSX. The installation went smoothly with the 15.5MB windows installer, but I found it bit annoying that during the installation process the installer started to download an additional 15MB package, apparently it was the Adobe AIR installer. The only way to start the player is by choosing a movie from the Voddler webpage, this even if the player is installed locally and the movies are cached on disk.
Sadly this is the point where things start to go downhill.
At the time of writing there were only 45 movies available, 20 free and the rest 25 costing between 2 to 4 euros. I understand that Voddler is still in beta, but this is a huge problem. People have more then 45 DVD:s at home and this is supposed to be a VOD service. It will also be interesting to know if the users are actually willing to pay for the movies or just watch the free ones. I doubt that the current model will work. To succeed Voddler needs to make all the content free, sponsored with commercials, and to have a premium service with a (monthly) subscription fee, just like Spotify.
It's interesting that the Voddler front page has an ad that state they have both Toy Story and Toy Story 2 available, well I didn't find them. I chose to watch, a for me totally unknown movie as most of them were, Wolfhound.
Besides the company related information the Voddler web pages only contain the content list and the possibility to edit your user account. This is good because it is all that is really needed. Please keep it that way. The user account page includes the payment settings to pay for content with credit cards. The web pages work fine except for some strange lag/glitch in the movie list filtering (Premium/Free checkboxes).
The player itself seemed to work surprisingly well. The UI was clean and simplistic. Jumping to an arbitrary location was slow by this was not Voddlers fault (see below). Stopping the player and then restarting it, made the player ask me if I wish to resume from the previous location, how nice of it. The player defaults to full-screen, but works in windowed mode too. Subtitles work and the language can be changed during playback. The player includes the ability to play video at a lower resolution, this is useful on slower hardware.
Sadly my slow Intel Atom N280 based laptop and slow internet connection made the movie unwatchable. This because of lots of lagging and buffering, but that is definitely not Voddlers fault. Also to be honest, the movie seemed quite boring.
Voddler doesn't seem technically too bad (except for the missing Linux client), but they need content, content and more content.
So, just to summarize, Voddler - Ambitious but disappointing.
Sunday, May 2, 2010
In the right place at the right time with the wrong lens
Well, almost. I was going to shoot the annual TS-kortteliajot bicycle race in Turku but missed the start and chose the wrong lenses. I really could have used my 10-22 or fisheye lens to get some low ultrawide shots. Luckily my Canon EF-s 17-85 is pretty versatile in bright conditions. However what I really missed and doesn't have was a fast fast-focusing tele zoom lens. I'm thinking of a 70-200 2.8 USM lens. The race took place over a week ago but I only now got time to write a blog entry.
Anyway below are a few shots, and the Picasaweb gallery with the all the shots is here.
Anyway below are a few shots, and the Picasaweb gallery with the all the shots is here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)